What's Happening
29 minutes ago

Bitcoin Breaks $107,000, Ethereum Dips, Dogecoin Rallies As 'Greed' Sentiment Takes Over: Analyst Predicts BTC 'Primed' For A New All-Time High

benzingabenzinga.com
43 minutes ago

Chuck Schumer Raises Concerns Over Trump And DOGE Impact On US Coast Guard After Mexican Ship Collides With Brooklyn Bridge: 'We Know They've Been Med...

benzingabenzinga.com
1 hour ago

The US Could Lose $12.5 Billion In Travel Revenue In 2025 Due To Political Uncertainties

benzingabenzinga.com
2 hours ago

Joe Biden Diagnosed With Advanced Prostate Cancer, Trump Wishes Former President A 'Fast And Successful Recovery'

benzingabenzinga.com
2 hours ago

Someone Asks, Why Do People Still Equate Luxury Cars With Being Rich When 'It's Common Knowledge Anyone Can Finance Or Lease A Luxury Car'

benzingabenzinga.com
3 hours ago

3 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks That Could Soar in the Second Half of 2025

foolfool.com
3 hours ago

'My Coworkers Think I'm DOGE'—A Federal Worker Says, 'I Receive Mean Looks And Conversations Are Straight-Up Dying When I Walk By'

benzingabenzinga.com
4 hours ago

Mom Asks Suze Orman: 'Did We Create A Monster?' 23-Year-Old Daughter Has $250K Saved But Refuses To Pay For Dates Or Family Outings

benzingabenzinga.com
4 hours ago

Down 12% This Year, Should You Buy Alphabet Stock?

foolfool.com
4 hours ago

The 2 Best Stocks to Invest $1,000 in Right Now

foolfool.com
4 hours ago

Where Will D-Wave Quantum Stock Be in 1 Year?

foolfool.com
4 hours ago

Bull Case "Back on the Table" for Apple, Microsoft, and Palantir Following Trade Truce, Says Dan Ives

foolfool.com
6 hours ago

'The One, Big, Beautiful Bill' Would Create 'MAGA' Savings Accounts—With A $1,000 Gift From The Government At Birth

benzingabenzinga.com
6 hours ago

'The One, Big, Beautiful Bill' Would Create 'MAGA' Savings Accounts—With A $1,000 Gift From The Government At Birth

benzingabenzinga.com
6 hours ago

CoreWeave, Super Micro Computer And Coinbase Are Among Top 11 Large-Cap Gainers Last Week (May 12-May 16): Are The Others In Your Portfolio?

benzingabenzinga.com
6 hours ago

Meta Pleads With Judge To Dismiss FTC's Antitrust Case in High-Stakes Trial

benzingabenzinga.com
6 hours ago

Bitcoin Skyrockets Past $105,000 Mark, Triggers $250 Billion Crypto Market Rally

benzingabenzinga.com
7 hours ago

JPMorgan Chase: US Economy Likely To Skirt Recession, Forecasts Sluggish Growth

benzingabenzinga.com
7 hours ago

Elon Musk's PAC Promised $100 Per Signature—Now It's Facing a Lawsuit

benzingabenzinga.com
7 hours ago

If I Were A Student Today, Here's How I'd Use AI To Do My Job Better, Says Nvidia CEO

benzingabenzinga.com

President Trump’s Biggest Social Security Proposal Could Be Bad News for Retirees

One of the biggest voting issues for seniors in last year’s U.S. Presidential election was Social Security. There’s good reason for that. The government program is essential to the budgets of millions of Americans. Roughly half of people age 65 or older receive 50% or more of their income from Social Security, according to data reviewed by the SSA.

President Trump appealed to these voters in his campaign by saying he would work to make sure they get the most possible from the program. That includes a proposal to eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits. Not only are taxes on Social Security income complicated, but they also present an additional financial burden on many households collecting benefits.

Start Your Mornings Smarter! Wake up with Breakfast news in your inbox every market day. Sign Up For Free »

However, eliminating the tax on Social Security comes with some bad news for retirees too. As with everything in economics, there are some significant trade-offs.

President Donald Trump sitting at the resolute desk with a folio laid out in front of him and pen in hand.

Image source: The White House.

Seniors are facing major benefit cuts, and the clock is ticking

It’s important to understand the current state of Social Security before diving into how President Trump’s proposal will impact seniors. As it stands, retirees are facing a major cut in benefits in the near future that will be much worse than any taxes most of them currently pay on benefits.

The government established a trust fund for Social Security in 1939. All of the taxes it collects on wages go into the trust fund, and all the benefits it pays out come out of the trust fund. In the meantime, it invests the excess cash held by the fund into stable government bonds to help the trust fund grow and support future benefits payments.

That system worked well as the population grew and the standard of living improved. More workers earning higher average wages resulted in a massive surplus.

However, the trust fund’s balance started shrinking near the end of the last decade as baby boomers retired and the workforce grew more slowly. The trust fund’s assets have shrunk by $260 billion since the end of 2018, falling to $2.54 trillion as of the end of last year. And the rate of decline is accelerating. Net assets fell over $100 billion last year.

US Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund Assets at End of Year Chart

Data by YCharts.

The Social Security Trustees estimate that if there aren’t any changes to the program, it will deplete the entire trust fund sometime in 2033. At that point, the tax revenue it brings in will only cover an estimated 79% of retirement benefits.

In other words, seniors are facing a permanent 21% haircut on their Social Security benefits in just a few years without substantial Social Security reforms.

Most people won’t pay that much in Social Security taxes

Social Security taxes are extremely complex, but the long and short of it is that most households will pay less in taxes each year than what a 21% cut to benefits entails.

The government determines how much, if any, of your Social Security benefits count as taxable income based on a metric called “combined income.” Combined income adds half of your Social Security benefits to your adjusted gross income and any untaxed interest income from the year.

If your combined income exceeds certain thresholds, you’ll pay income taxes on up to 85% of your benefits, as detailed below.

Taxable benefits Combined Income (Single) Combined Income (Joint)
0% Less than $25,000 Less than $32,000
Up to 50% Between $25,000 and $34,000 Between $32,000 and $44,000
Up to 85% More than $34,000 More than $44,000

Data source: IRS.

You might think those thresholds are extremely low, and they are. That’s because those numbers haven’t been updated for inflation since they were put in place more than 30 years ago. However, since Social Security benefits get an annual COLA tied to inflation, more and more seniors are facing tax bills on their Social Security benefits. That makes Trump’s proposal to eliminate those taxes increasingly appealing.

However, it’s worth noting that, when compared to the existential challenge facing Social Security and the potential 21% cut in benefits across the board, the current taxes aren’t that bad. The top quintile of households pay an average of 20% in taxes on their benefits, according to The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. That corresponds with an income of more than $205,800. Lower-income households that rely heavily on Social Security don’t face a significant, if any, financial burden from taxes on benefits. The bottom 40% of senior households by income pay an average of less than 1% in taxes on Social Security.

Here’s the real bad news

Remember, the Social Security trust fund only has two sources of revenue: the interest it collects on the bonds it invests in and tax revenue. While most of that tax revenue comes from earned income, a significant portion comes from the income taxes it collects on Social Security benefits.

That means Trump’s proposal to eliminate taxes on Social Security income will reduce the amount the trust fund brings in. And with less coming into the fund and the same amount going out, its depletion will accelerate. A study from the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Business estimates ending taxation on benefits will reduce revenue by $1.45 trillion over the next 10 years.

As a result, retirees can expect the Social Security trust fund to run out of money even sooner if Trump successfully eliminates taxes on benefits. On top of that, such a move will require deeper benefits cuts once the trust fund’s assets are depleted because it will have less revenue coming in as well. So, seniors are facing the potential of a much bigger burden on their household budgets in just a few years than taxes present right now. That will hit low-income households, which rely on Social Security benefits, much harder.

It’s important to note that maintaining taxes on Social Security isn’t going to fix the program’s challenges. The government needs to make wide-ranging reforms to ensure the health and longevity of Social Security. But eliminating taxes on benefits will move it in the wrong direction and largely serves to benefit high-income households in the short run.

The $22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook

If you’re like most Americans, you’re a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known “Social Security secrets” could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $22,924 more… each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we’re all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.

View the “Social Security secrets” »

The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Related Posts

You decided long ago that 2025 was going to be the year you retired. Now it’s here, and you’re wondering whether that’s still the best

I almost fainted when I saw the cost of a business class ticket to Australia. Looking for a secure place to grow your savings? See

Becoming a homeowner was, without question, one of the most exciting financial milestones of my life. But I’m no mortgage expert, and there were definitely

My buddy once bought a $4,000 engagement ring on a credit card. Romantic? Yes! Responsible?? Not so much — especially when you’re paying an APR