What's Happening
22 minutes ago

SoundHound AI Stock Sinks 8% as Revenue Misses Wall Street's Estimate. Is SOUN Stock a Buy?

foolfool.com
2 hours ago

If You Invested $100 In This Stock 5 Years Ago, You Would Have This Much Today

benzingabenzinga.com
2 hours ago

MIT Dropout Ethan Thornton Secures $100M For Mach Industries, Backed By Sequoia And Khosla, To Revolutionize U.S. Defense Tech

benzingabenzinga.com
2 hours ago

A 38-Year-Old Father Shares How He Paid $388,000 In Debt After Listening To Dave Ramsey: 'We Held Off On A Lot Of Big Purchases'

benzingabenzinga.com
2 hours ago

Here's How Much You Would Have Made Owning Broadcom Stock In The Last 15 Years

benzingabenzinga.com
2 hours ago

Bill Gates Predicts 3-Day Workweeks — Says It's 'Probably OK' If 'Machines Can Make The Food And Stuff' Because There's More To Life Than Work

benzingabenzinga.com
3 hours ago

$100 Invested In Guidewire Software 10 Years Ago Would Be Worth This Much Today

benzingabenzinga.com
3 hours ago

Why Axcelis Technologies Soared More Than 10% Higher This Week

foolfool.com
3 hours ago

'Too Late To Retire?' 61-Year-Old Couple Has $75K In 401(k) Despite $130K Salary — Dave Ramsey Warns They'll 'Retire On Dog Food' At This Rate

benzingabenzinga.com
3 hours ago

Marqeta: A Risky Investment or a Future Leader in Payment Solutions?

foolfool.com
3 hours ago

Why Nebius Group Stock Rocketed 11% Higher This Week

foolfool.com
3 hours ago

Here's How Much $1000 Invested In Domino's Pizza 20 Years Ago Would Be Worth Today

benzingabenzinga.com
3 hours ago

Scott Galloway 'Prof G' Says 30% Of Seniors Should Lose Social Security — Richest Generation Ever Is Taking $1.2 Trillion From Struggling Youth

benzingabenzinga.com
4 hours ago

Why TeraWulf Stock Got Rocked Today

foolfool.com
4 hours ago

Here's How Much You Would Have Made Owning UnitedHealth Group Stock In The Last 10 Years

benzingabenzinga.com
4 hours ago

Why MP Materials Stock Plummeted by 8% on Friday

foolfool.com
4 hours ago

Breaking Down Turtle Beach: 4 Analysts Share Their Views

benzingabenzinga.com
4 hours ago

Forecasting The Future: 7 Analyst Projections For US Foods Hldg

benzingabenzinga.com
4 hours ago

Demystifying Lincoln National: Insights From 11 Analyst Reviews

benzingabenzinga.com
4 hours ago

Expert Outlook: Evolent Health Through The Eyes Of 9 Analysts

benzingabenzinga.com

Is It Better to Collect Social Security at 62, 67, or 70? A Detailed Study Offers a Clear Answer.

In March, more than 52 million retired workers brought home an average Social Security check of $1,997.13. While this is a relatively modest monthly sum, it’s proved vital to helping retirees make ends meet.

In each of the previous 23 years, pollster Gallup has surveyed retirees to determine how reliant they are on the Social Security income they receive. Consistently, between 80% and 90% of retired-worker beneficiaries lean on their payout, to some degree, to cover their expenses.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »

In other words, getting as much income as possible from Social Security isn’t a luxury — for many, it’s foundational to their financial well-being.

But to maximize what you’ll receive, you’ll first need to understand the nuts and bolts of how your benefit is calculated and grasp just how important your claiming age can be to monthly and lifetime Social Security income collection. Collecting your payout early (at age 62), taking a middle-ground approach (age 67), or being patient (age 70) can make a huge difference in what you’ll receive.

A pair of glasses, a pen, and a calculator set atop a Social Security benefits application form.

Image source: Getty Images.

These four variables are used to calculate your monthly Social Security check

Although Social Security isn’t always the easiest government program to understand, the four variables used by the Social Security Administration (SSA) to calculate your monthly benefit are as straightforward as they come:

  1. Earnings history
  2. Work history
  3. Full retirement age
  4. Claiming age

The first two factors — your work and earnings history — are inseparable. The SSA takes into account your 35 highest-earning, inflation-adjusted years when calculating how much you’ll be paid on a monthly basis. Presumably, a higher average wage or salary throughout your lifetime (investment income doesn’t count) should translate into a larger Social Security retirement benefit.

But there’s a bit of a catch, as well. If you don’t have at least 35 qualifying years of work, you’ll have no chance to maximize what you’ll receive from the program, regardless of how much you earn in a given year. For every year less than 35 worked, a $0 is averaged into your calculation.

The third variable of importance is your full retirement age. This is the age at which you become eligible to receive 100% of your retirement benefit, determined entirely by the year you were born.

Last but certainly not least is your claiming age. Arguably, nothing has the potential to swing the payout pendulum more than the age you choose to begin receiving a Social Security benefit. While retired-worker benefits can begin as early as age 62, there’s a financial incentive to exercise patience. For every year a worker waits to claim their payout, beginning at age 62 and continuing until age 70, their benefit can grow by as much as 8%, as shown in the table:

Birth Year Age 62 Age 63 Age 64 Age 65 Age 66 Age 67 Age 68 Age 69 Age 70
1943-1954 75% 80% 86.7% 93.3% 100% 108% 116% 124% 132%
1955 74.2% 79.2% 85.6% 92.2% 98.9% 106.7% 114.7% 122.7% 130.7%
1956 73.3% 78.3% 84.4% 91.1% 97.8% 105.3% 113.3% 121.3% 129.3%
1957 72.5% 77.5% 83.3% 90% 96.7% 104% 112% 120% 128%
1958 71.7% 76.7% 82.2% 88.9% 95.6% 102.7% 110.7% 118.7% 126.7%
1959 70.8% 75.8% 81.1% 87.8% 94.4% 101.3% 109.3% 117.3% 125.3%
1960 or later 70% 75% 80% 86.7% 93.3% 100% 108% 116% 124%

Data source: Social Security Administration.

There are well-defined advantages and drawbacks to collecting your benefits at 62, 67, and 70

Despite the sizable variances in payout percentages displayed in the table, every age within the traditional initial collection range of 62 through 70 has its own unique advantages and drawbacks. This includes three claiming ages that should be particularly popular moving forward: 62, 67, and 70.

Let’s take a brief look at the respective pros and cons associated with these three ages.

Age 62

One of the prime reasons retired workers choose to take their payout at 62 is that they don’t want to wait. For retirees who aren’t working, an early claim can be too tempting to pass up.

Additionally, some retirees collect their payout early due to concerns about looming benefit cuts. According to the 2024 Social Security Board of Trustees Report, the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund (OASI) is slated to exhaust its asset reserves by 2033. If the OASI’s asset reserves are depleted, retired workers could face a 21% benefit cut in eight years. Collecting at 62 may be viewed as a way to front-run possible benefit reductions.

On the other hand, claiming as early as possible has its downsides. Your monthly payout will be permanently reduced by 25% to 30%, depending on your birth year, and the SSA may be able to withhold some or all of your payout (prior to you reaching your full retirement age) if you earn too much.

Age 67

The allure of the middle-ground approach is that a little patience can go a long way. Waiting five years to collect your retired-worker payout ensures you’ll receive, at minimum, 100% of what you’re due — and likely still be young enough to enjoy it.

For workers born in 1960 or later, age 67 represents their full retirement age. This is a psychologically important age that at least some retirees will aim for. The primary drawback to collecting your payout at 67 is that you’ll potentially leave a lot of Social Security income on the table if you live well into your 80s, or beyond.

Age 70

What makes an age 70 claim so intriguing for retirees is the ability to maximize their monthly benefit. Collecting at 70 increases your Social Security check by 24% to 32% (depending on your birth year) above and beyond what you would have received at full retirement age.

While collecting at 70 can pump up your monthly payout, the potential negative is that it offers no guarantee that you’ll live long enough to also maximize your lifetime income collection from Social Security.

Keeping these advantages and drawbacks in mind, the pivotal question must be: Is it better to collect Social Security at 62, 67, or 70? A detailed study published in 2019 offers a clear answer.

A seated person counting a fanned pile of one hundred dollar bills in their hands.

Image source: Getty Images.

There is a statistically superior Social Security claiming age

Six years ago, researchers at United Income published a report (The Retirement Solution Hiding in Plain Sight) that used data from the University of Michigan’s Health and Retirement Study to extrapolate the claiming decisions of 20,000 retired workers. United Income examined which claiming ages, if any, gave retirees the best chance to optimize their Social Security payout. In this instance, an “optimized” payout would be the claiming age that resulted in the highest possible lifetime income collection.

One of United Income’s initial findings wasn’t a surprise: Only 4% of the 20,000 retired workers studied had optimized their payout.

Without knowing the exact date we’re going to pass away, there’s no way to know whether we’ve made the best possible claiming decision. In short, there will always be some educated guesswork involved.

Furthermore, everyone’s path is unique. The combination of your financial needs, access to retirement accounts, tax implications, marital status, personal health, and so on will be different from every other retiree. This means there isn’t a one-size-fits-all blueprint when it comes to collecting benefits.

But there was another finding from United Income that did stand out. Specifically, researchers noted a clear inversion between actual and optimal claims.

For example, 79% of all retired-worker claims occurred at ages 62, 63, or 64. However, only 8% of claims in this initial collection range were deemed optimal by United Income.

On the opposite end of the spectrum, very few claims were made at 70. Yet, a whopping 57% of the 20,000 retired workers analyzed would have optimized their lifetime payout had they waited until 70 to begin receiving their benefit.

To be clear, this doesn’t mean every future retiree is incentivized to wait until age 70. For instance, people with one or more chronic health conditions whose lifespans could be shortened are more likely to maximize their lifetime Social Security income by claiming early. But when examining the bigger picture, age 70 looks to be a statistically superior collection age for a majority of future retirees.

The $22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook

If you’re like most Americans, you’re a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known “Social Security secrets” could help ensure a boost in your retirement income.

One easy trick could pay you as much as $22,924 more… each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we’re all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these strategies.

View the “Social Security secrets” »

The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Related Posts

It’s too early to know for sure what the 2026 Social Security cost-of-living adjustment, or COLA, might be. However, we have a revised estimate from

There are several important decisions to make about your Social Security benefits. You decide how many years you work and which jobs you work at.

There’s a reason so many older Americans rush to claim Social Security at 62. It’s hard to avoid the temptation to take benefits the moment

Social Security probably forms a key part of your retirement plan — and that’s OK. It makes sense you’d factor these benefits into your retirement