I’m working extremely hard to build up savings for retirement. I know that I can’t plan to cover my bills on Social Security alone. And I also know that I don’t want to have to worry about money in retirement.
I spent enough time in my 20s stressing over managing my expenses while paying off student loans. And I spent enough of my 30s worrying about home repairs while juggling child care costs and a mortgage. Come retirement, I want money to be the last thing I worry about, which is why I’m willing to make sacrifices now to fund my 401(k).
Of course, I don’t want to put in all of this hard work just to blow through my savings in retirement and end up short. I recognize that it’s important to manage my nest egg wisely once I’m ready to use it.
To that end, a lot of financial experts will suggest following the 4% rule. The 4% rule tells you to withdraw 4% of your nest egg during your first year of retirement and adjust future withdrawals for inflation. If you stick to it, there’s a good chance your savings will last for 30 years.
I’m not going to come out and say that the 4% rule is a bad choice for everyone. But it won’t work for me for one big reason.
When you need flexibility
Since I don’t have a crystal ball, I can’t predict what my 401(k) balance will be come retirement. But I’m hoping it’s enough to cover my expenses so I don’t have to rely on Social Security for essential bills. I’d rather be able to look at those benefits as extra money I can use for leisure.
But whether I retire with $400,000, $1 million, or more, I want to make sure my 401(k) doesn’t run out on me. So I intend to manage my withdrawals carefully. At the same time, though, I don’t think I’ll use the 4% rule for one big reason — it doesn’t offer me the flexibility I want.
While the 4% rule has you adjusting withdrawals for inflation, it doesn’t have you adjusting withdrawals based on needs and wants. And that doesn’t work for me.
I need a withdrawal strategy that allows me to tap my 401(k) to a larger degree some years for things like travel or home repairs. Or, I may want to make the occasional large purchase, like new furniture or a new car.
It stands to reason that if there’s a year when my only travel is a series of local camping trips and another year has me taking three trips overseas, that second year might be a more expensive one. I want the flexibility to do something like that without feeling guilty because I may be going beyond the 4% mark.
A starting point, but nothing more
If you feel the 4% rule works for you, you should use it. Otherwise, you may want to do what I plan to do — figure out an initial withdrawal rate for your first year of retirement, and then adjust future withdrawals based on needs and wants rather than inflation.
Now at this point, I couldn’t tell you what my initial withdrawal rate will be. I may decide to take out 5%, or start with 2% or 3% if my expenses aren’t that high. I also intend to consult a financial advisor to help me land on an initial withdrawal rate that allows me to do the things I want without going overboard.
Many people have success with the 4% rule. But it never hurts to look at other options, even if you generally think it’s sound financial advice.
The $22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook
If you’re like most Americans, you’re a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known “Social Security secrets” could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $22,924 more… each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we’re all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.
View the “Social Security secrets” »
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.